imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
Matthew Barney's epic films are weird labours of Hercules. Whether he's shinning up an elevator shaft, walking along the seabed, squeezing through a tunnel connecting two cars, or climbing around the proscenium arch of a theatre, Barney's self-imposed tasks are a sort of metaphysical obstacle course, bringing to mind the more mystical end of the fiction film genre: the crossing-the-pool-with-a-candle scene in Tarkovsky's "Nostalgia" or the hauling-a-boat-over-a-mountain in Herzog's "Fitzcarraldo", say.

But Barney's films start with his sculpture; a vat of liquid vaseline on the deck of a whaler or a sex-organs-based installation in a blimp. Turning the space-based medium that is sculpture into the the time-based medium that is film is in itself a "trial of Hercules", and the way Barney accomplishes it is with music, a kind of intermediate artform between space and time. Jonathan Beppler's (and now Bjork's) scores are hugely important to the success of the whole enterprise.

I haven't yet seen "Drawing Restraint 9"; I'll see it with Kyoto Karin Komoto on Sunday evening. A Japanese person and a Japanophile will be able to compare notes on the film's use of Shinto, gagaku, tea ceremony and so on. What I have seen, though, is the trailer (which looks great) and the press.

Some of the reviews have been aggressively dismissive. While the New York Times liked the film, they noted "an overt spiritual dimension that is a new element in Mr. Barney's work. If that spirituality is an outgrowth of his relationship with Bjork, it is a welcome addition in an oeuvre whose obsession with athleticism, competition and fertility rites has sometimes taken on fascistic overtones." Ah, poor Hercules, your labours now seem to us like fascism! But who knew fertility itself was fascist? Well, survival of the fittest and all that, I suppose Mother Nature has a bit of a Hitler thing going on, or at least a Darwin one.

The most dismissive review came in the New Yorker, who called the film "'The Simple Life' for a pair of self-important art-world celebrities. With a combination of lavish pageantry and industrial exertion, the Nisshin Maru, Japan's last whaling ship, sails off from Nagasaki Bay. Along with its crew, it carries two guests, Matthew Barney and Bjork, who submit to elaborate rituals of tonsure, pomade, and dress at the hands of solemn bearers whose job it is to keep from laughing at their employers' airs. They partake of a classical tea ceremony in an unabashed display of Oriental kitsch that makes "Memoirs of a Geisha" look like an ethnographic documentary. As their berth fills with what might be water or whale oil, the couple lovingly carve each other up into human sushi. Barney, the director of this unbearably empty spectacle, has in effect filmed at great expense the couple's designer-sightseeing cruise, with little more skill and vastly more pretense than the average tourist."

Whether you like Barney's oeuvre or not, it's hard to deny that, by adding an epic sort of narrative to his sculpture, he's not only had considerable impact on the public, but also influenced other artists, and established a new genre, the blockbuster sculpture. Watching Pierre Huyghe's film A Journey That Wasn't, for me the highlight of this year's Whitney Biennial, I couldn't help wondering if it was a parody of Barney's apparently not-so-sui-generis genre. Huyghe, exactly like Barney, sails through an icy landscape. In Huyghe's case, it's to discover an island with a single animal living on it. There's much ritualistic (and terribly beautiful) play with weather balloons. Then, back in Central Park, Huyghe recreates the voyage with lasers, smoke and an orchestra. The music by Joshua Cody sounds remarkably like Jonathan Beppler's scores for the Cremaster series.

Interviewed in today's Liberation, Barney explains his incursion into film quite simply:

"Cinema was initially a way for me to enlarge the definition of what I understood by "sculpture". I was very excited by the idea of molding vaseline on the deck of a ship and allowing it to melt when the mold had been removed. The intention is clearer than in the other works, where the objects came before or after the film. Cinema culture people wonder how a film can literally make itself into a sculpture. But in art we have a tradition, Land Art, and I've always felt comfortable with that."

Oddly enough, when people parody Barney, it's his Herculean narrative rather than his attempts to turn sculpture into film they focus on. Here are three suggestions Michael Atkinson published in the Village Voice in 2003 for three more Cremaster films (the series has now ended):

Cremaster 8
Wearing a bronze jockstrap, an astronaut's helmet, and a coat of mango-peach latex paint, Barney scales Angkor Wat while the Green Bay Packers sit in an empty swimming pool, taking turns to blow up a used-car-lot balloon figure of Uncle Sam through a valve on its crotch. Cambodians slowly fill up the pool with cups of guacamole. By the time Barney finishes his climb and sings "If I Can't Sell It, I'll Keep Sittin' On It," the Packers are immersed.
Cremaster 6
Whoopi Goldberg reads the Magna Carta over the Yankee Stadium PA system, as a boa constrictor slowly slithers around the bases after a remote-control toy car with a real mouse in the driver's seat. In the outfield, 30 naked women play 30 grand pianos wearing cardboard Dalai Lama masks. When the boa makes it home, fireworks erupt, spelling "I LIKE IKE" in the sky.
Cremaster 7
Strapped together with bungee cords, Barney and a proboscis monkey run through a shopping mall as members of the Bolshoi Ballet and the cast of Mummenschanz battle each other with paintball guns. Barney is dressed as Elizabeth II; the monkey is completely shaved. In Sears, they meet Udo Kier, who's trimming dwarf juniper trees with a toenail cutter. Together the trio make it to the parking lot, board a circus elephant, and ride into the sunset.

I'll add my review in the comments section on Sunday evening. Anyone seen "Drawing Restraint 9"? Your thoughts? Is Hercules on form?
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 03:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottbateman.livejournal.com
Where's it playing on Sunday?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
It's on every day for the next ten days or so at IFC (http://www.ifcfilms.com/), West 4th Street.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 03:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottbateman.livejournal.com
Excellent! I'll go see it next week sometime.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 03:54 pm (UTC)
aberrantangels: (I don't trust you dogfuckers)
From: [personal profile] aberrantangels
The chant at the beginning of the trailer reminded me of some of the chants Geinô Yamashiro-gumi did for the Akira score.

The suggestions for Cremasters 6-8, on the other hand, reminded me of Leo Rosten's "Pop Art, Shmop Art, Leave Me Alone" (Harper's, 1965), which I have in a Reader's Digest Treasury of American Humor I inherited from my grandfather. I specifically thought of the first piece the narrator encounters (all spelling and capitalization as in the original):

Because in that window is a garbadge pail full of Custard, and across the pail in pukey purple letters is the word — BEING. And in the goo are maybe 100 popsikles covered by a Fish-net, in which a U.S. flag is planted! And across our Stars & Stripes is pasted — NOTHINGNESS.


The rest of the piece is about similar parodies of pop-art, and Rosten's narrator dismissing it all as "the work of &12frac; wits who would not pass an Insanity Test given by Casey Stengel." Making strawmen and lighting them on fire is always fun for some people, as a casual perusal of your own comments on a typical day will show. (It also reminded me of this webcomic.)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 03:55 pm (UTC)
aberrantangels: (oops)
From: [personal profile] aberrantangels
Argh. That should be "½ wits". I need to use the preview button more.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bifteck.livejournal.com
I hope to see it this weekend. As a fellow Japanophile, and a huge fan of Bjork, I'm very intrigued - but I've never seen any of the Cremaster cycle.

I'd also like to see the Bjorkestra (http://www.bjorkestra.com/live/) at Joe's Pub, which is coming up in a couple of weeks.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 04:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Wow, I've never seen a fraction like that! I have no idea how to type those... I'm impressed!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 04:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bikerbar.livejournal.com
Must be something in the stars this week Momus
as I've been blogging about Hercules the last few days

What strikes me about the labours of Hercules, and similarly with the work of Barney, is that the meaninglessness of our actions in life can be represented by massive exertion to no clear end. The point is that there is no point, and the process is all. We struggle meaninglessly, but it makes for good spectacle.

Barney's work reminds me of the elaborate mise-en-scene of Wes Anderson. And it is also a parody of the art world in a way. Your quotes from Michael Atkinson sound like they could be actual Barney films - and that shows how peculiarly ridiculous the world he creates is. I think when he talks about filmmaking-as-sculpture its just an exercise in artspeak. He's framing his activity in this way, but its somewhat ridiculous. All activity can be defined as sculpture. Beuys's work in that direction were much more interesting, as they were engaging politically. Barney, on the other hand, seems to have been seduced by the star machinery of film.

Hercules's labours are a coded astrological metaphor, like some art-of-memory, for as they were being told under the stars the heavens helped to illustrate the story, or vice versa. Barney hasn't quite reached that level of recognition ... but he would like to be a god. Perhaps in our age, Barney and Bjork are analogous to figures sitting on Mt. Olympus. But those who care are far fewer in number.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 04:19 pm (UTC)
aberrantangels: (geek)
From: [personal profile] aberrantangels
I get it to appear by typing &frac12;. The first time, I put the "12" before the "frac".

unrelated

Date: 2006-03-31 04:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snowy-florimell.livejournal.com
Did you entitle this icon "cappy" because you're wearing earth tones like a Capricorn might?
Image

He suffered discomfiture when you finally put your birthdate up, but my friend used to think you were a Capricorn. Duh, you're an ultimate Aquarian.

I'm Gemini. thanks :P

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Image

I like how he has this thing going on with his beard in the new film.

Re: unrelated

Date: 2006-03-31 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Yes, I'm a caricature Aquarian.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
Yes, been by the IFC all week, and fully intend to see it.

As was the case with the Cremaster cycle, the articles and even Barney's own obligatory, tiresome artworld spiel get in the way of the experience of the films themselves. I don't care what they're "about"—it limits the experience. Why this need to understand it? I would prefer to let the images, edits and sounds hold sway, and work on the mind as they will. I'll make my own maps and burn them afterwards, thank you very much.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bikerbar.livejournal.com
So now he's Moses??

I have my opening in a half an hour. On the scale of fame and renown I am a small speck of dust compared to the titan Matthew Barney. Guess I have to live inside a dead whale or something next time ...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 05:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] silenceinspades.livejournal.com
i saw them at the bowery ballroom a couple of months ago (maybe?). i was sort of disappointed as i found it more humorous than both the people playing and the people in the audience. it has inspired me to start my own bjork tribute though, bjorkulele. my ukulele version of pagan poetry is promising so far.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bifteck.livejournal.com
You know - I was afraid of that. I listened to one clip of their version of "Army of Me" and I felt a bit more skeptical. I'd like to catch it anyway, just to judge for myself.

Oooh, Bjorkulele! Words can't express how much I love the ukulele, the accordion, the banjo, and other ill-connotated instruments. If only I could play them... I plan on teaching myself the accordion soon.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 05:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pacina.livejournal.com
I love the Cremaster Cycle.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] silenceinspades.livejournal.com
i love them too.

after enough practice i'm sure you'll be well on your way to putting together bjorkordion, which is a fantastic idea, as long as the 3 bjork tribute bands don't book rival tours. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 05:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anglerfish96.livejournal.com
He kinda resembles John Malkovich in the hirsute hairsuit picture.

I wonder if the Walker is going to get this soon.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 07:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dzima.livejournal.com
it is also a parody of the art world in a way

Yes, I'm still waiting For Barney to become the next Robert Longo and start directing Hollywood feature films and MTV music videos.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 08:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] armoredbaby.livejournal.com
The Bolshoy and Mummenschanz in paintball war...what an image.

I think the edge goes to the Mummengroup, for they have that toilet paper headed participant to help with the damage on the field.

Re:latively unrelated

Date: 2006-03-31 08:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] armoredbaby.livejournal.com
Representing that pseudo-group:

I stand -- Capriquarianly.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 08:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] armoredbaby.livejournal.com
He does! I immediately thought that.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 08:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] remyartista.livejournal.com
hello. i'm a stranger to you but i wanted to change that by saying hi. i did a search on google for you after being intrigued at the whitney and too shy to ask your name and shake your hand. my lad and i followed you around a bit and wanted to learn more. i hope you don't mind that i've friended you. i am loving your art posts and can't wait to learn more about you.

i'm including a drawing of you in my comic zine about the biennial because you made me do a happy dance inside. yep it's true!

i'll leave you alone now i promise!

yours truly mofo,
~Shannon

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-31 08:20 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Blog Hits instead of Bong Hits
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>