(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-24 03:48 am (UTC)
Oh, I'm very much with you on the bicycles issue. Of course I'd like to see popular support and government support for the bicycle. It's just that a theme I've been circling around quite a lot recently is that virtue is neither the result of freedom of individual choice nor of government legislation. Virtues like bicycle-riding, high-density living, communal living, bloat-free software, a bloat-free body-shape, organic food, slow life, ecologically-sustainable lifestyles, low-to-no emissions... these are better achieved by -- I won't say poverty, but by people finding their material affluence capped at a certain level, and adopting austerity measures. Some have suggested that the most virtuous income level is around $20,000 a year, and I tend to agree. That's exactly the right figure to make car ownership prohibitive, for instance.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags