imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
Yesterday's entry Why are Japanese houses so cold? may have left you with the impression that Japan is incapable of designing dwellings. It isn't true; in fact, Japan is home to some of the world's most interesting architects. And the buildings they make contain exactly the same quirks that perplex some of us about low-end Japanese housing. Why isn't it bigger? Why doesn't it exclude the outside better?

Take the glamorous and innovative Moriyama House in Tokyo, designed by Ryue Nishizawa of SANAA (his partnership with Kazuyo Sejima). SANAA are also responsible for the stunning new home for the New Museum being built on the Bowery in New York and the (rather less stunning) Dior store on Omote Sando.



The Moriyama "house" is in fact a cluster of ten white boxes. Although planning regulations in Tokyo are so lax that you can do just about anything regardless of the surrounding context, Nishizawa wanted to keep the big 290 square metre site in harmony with the scale of the buildings surrounding it, so instead of making one big building he made ten small ones. This also allows the owner to rent out some of the units until he's paid back his loans, at which point he'll occupy the whole complex. But already I can imagine Westerners wondering "Why do Japanese houses always have to be so small, even when they could be big?"

In his Designboom interview Moriyama says: "One of our constant big concerns is how to create a relation between the inside and outside, this is very important for us to think about." Now, this inside-outside issue also dismayed many Westerners in yesterday's comments; the fact that the temperature inside many Japanese homes is only a couple of degrees warmer than the temperature outside. The failure of Japanese dwellings, in other words, to swaddle and cocoon.



The Moriyama House deals with the inside-outside question (which is also the public-private question) by putting the bathroom outdoors. You read that right: this state-of-the-art house has an outside bathroom. To bathe, you have to walk through the open air in your bath-robe, and enter the small cube containing the bath. There's no internal way to get there. In winter you will feel cold on the way, in summer you will feel hot. What's more, it has an uncurtained glass wall. Hello stranger!

The Brutus magazine feature on the Moriyama house is a little conflicted on the public-private issue. "Rather than a walled-off kind of privacy," it quotes Nishizawa as saying, "I wanted the yard to create openness... the occupant is always aware of his or her neighbours, it's meant to be a living space where people might spontaneously get together in the yard at any moment and start a party." Nevertheless, the owner aims to expel all strangers from the site as soon as he has enough money, and his loans are paid off. So those parties will become increasingly inbred. Or, as Brutus more tactfully puts it, "The Moriyama house is a home that freely transforms between community and private residence, a process of change that the owner has the unique privilege to enjoy."

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 12:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malbogio.livejournal.com
It's certainly an interesting experiment, though I doubt anyone I know could handle the lack of privacy.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 03:38 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
i would be very interested in seeing more pictures of this house. would someone please provide a link?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 05:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iamcoreyd.livejournal.com
is there only one bathroom in the whole "complex" or...?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 05:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nuncstans.livejournal.com
I really enjoy reading your blog. Thanks a lot.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 06:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nato-dakke.livejournal.com
in other words, it's arbitrarily poorly designed to force people to live around it.

In other other words, it's a piece of technology that forces humans to adapt.

In yet other words, it's concept without regard for human existence.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 07:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
in other words, it's arbitrarily poorly designed to force people to live around it.

Not really; it's cunningly designed not only to help the owner pay off his debt by renting out self-contained units (and I'm sure they can easily be configured with internal bathrooms, if they aren't already), and also by being dramatic enough to appear in magazines, so that he can easily find tenants. The "iconic" can also be mega-practical, as the people of Bilbao found out when Frank Gehry made them a new museum.

In other other words, it's a piece of technology that forces humans to adapt.

Anything original forces us to adapt; without original authors, we'd no doubt all be reading bodice rippers and detective ficiton. The question is, does it make us adapt in ways that enhance or degrade our lives?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 10:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alphacomp.livejournal.com
I really like this; it reminds me of a more practical, minimalist version of Moseh Safdie's "Habitat" architecture.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 11:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Why are Japanese houses so cool?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 12:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nato-dakke.livejournal.com
It strikes me as though the whole thing exists to be put in magazines. Even having paid off his debts, he doesn't really have a living space more practical than an apartment building. It's just got a lot more windows.

It's fine(/good) to have a "couture" of the housing world, but this isn't the sort of avant garde that's ever intended to trickle into regular circulation.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 12:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mckibillo.livejournal.com
Well the issue of privacy in regards to Japanese homes is a very interesting one. It seems the Japanese are quite fiercely protective of the privacy of their homes. It's not unusual for lifelong friends to have never seen the inside of each others home, or at the most, past the front receiving room.

Homes aren't so much showcases to show off their sense of taste and "house proudness", or a reflection of their lifestyle, but rather places to completely fall apart. If you watch any of the popular daytime TV shows here where they enter the homes of average folk, the places are usually squalid pits.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
he doesn't really have a living space more practical than an apartment building. It's just got a lot more windows.

A complex rather than a single structure has a completely different relationship between inside and outside, as Nishizawa says. It reminds me of William Sheldon talking about the physiology of temerament: the big difference between ectomorphs and endomorphs is that skinny ectos (the word means literally "outside") have more of their body on the outside and fatty endos ("inside") have more on the inside. This means, paradoxically, that ectomorphs turn away from the excess stimulation, retreating into mental activity. Endomorphs, meanwhile, bubble away happily, enjoying the feeling of their guts ticking over.

The Moriyama house is "all skin and nerve", ectomorphic.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 01:21 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I think the only original part here is putting the thing in a city. I mean my
mothers house from the 18:th century on the countryside (in western europe) works exactly like that, five or six small buildings, each with a purpose that you have to walk between. The city location makes privacy an issue though, this might only work in japan and netherlands, where the dense style of living has made people give up on the privacy demands in life.

One thing I don't like is the way the architects have 'built in' or predetermined the way the house shold be used. A residence should in my opinion reflect the history and ideas of the residents. Will they only accept buyers who wants to sublet ?

/bug

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 01:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I didn't quote this in the piece, but the article in Brutus magazine says "There are no rules determining how a particular unit is to be used; a unit might be used as a dining room, as a listening den, and so on."

The house was built on commission, so it doesn't need to find a buyer, just some temporary letters who will help the commissioner/owner pay off the costs of construction before taking over the whole space.

Just being subjective again

Date: 2006-01-25 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nomorepolitics.livejournal.com
The theory behind this is really nice; I like the communal living possibilities.

But the final product is ugly. More boring white boxes in the landscape, that look like temporary construction site shacks. At least he could have used a more interesting choice of color. Absolutely terrible!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 02:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarmoung.livejournal.com
Given Japan's tenancy laws, I'm not convinced it would be that easy to boot out these strangers once you'd paid off the loan if they didn't want to go. Well, not legally...

I might feel more positive about the house if SANAA didn't look so much like (Comme-wearing) funeral directors and I can't help but think they've missed a trick by not mounting each building on some track system so you could change their relative positions, which could lead to some exciting Tetris-style standoffs with the sub-tenants.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 02:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Fresh thinking!

HIGH SCORE

Date: 2006-01-25 04:01 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
tetris houses would certainly be nice when your annoying neighbors decided to throw one of their spontaneous parties (has anyone ever seen japanese people actually capable of throwing a 'spontaneous party' without three weeks of cell phone negotiations beforehand, by the way? with their friends, let alone their neighbors!) and you, peacefully drinking your ryokucha, suddenly felt inspired to live on the other side of the block for the day...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-25 05:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alphacomp.livejournal.com
My theory is that coolness is actually a tangible natural resource, and in such a thing Japan is quite abundant.

commune

Date: 2006-01-25 10:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] booniebot.livejournal.com
My krisis friends from Obscure in Tokyo built an extra house (room) in their garden and seem to be capable of doing spontaneous parties. We did a Hutspot session last november, I cooked Hutspot, and the 4 people and 2 vistors that were in that night ate it, with beer and Nutella (bueueuehg!) see my www.fotolog.com/boonie entries in november 2005.,..

Idea for a movie:

Date: 2006-01-26 12:35 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Uncompromising thoughtless avant-garde architects forced to live in one of their own montrous creations.

The true test of good artist.

Re: Idea for a movie:

Date: 2006-01-26 01:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
It would pretty much just be a retread of Tati's Mon Oncle, wouldn't it? And the thing is, the visuals would totally upstage the morals. Especially for those of us watching it with the sound down.

Re: Idea for a movie:

Date: 2006-01-26 04:24 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Yes it would definitely be aesthetically neat, and fun to watch at the same time; it would be difficult to make it truly critical. But then satire often celebrates the very things it criticizes.

Re: Idea for a movie:

Date: 2006-01-26 09:53 am (UTC)

Why are Japanese houses so cool

Date: 2006-02-06 10:29 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I remember reading in an Anthropology book that this is because the ancestors of the culturally conservative Japanese had migrated northward from an area with a warmer climate. So traditional houses resemble those found in the tropics, and people tend to open doors and windows on a sunny day even in the middle of winter.

Re: Idea for a movie:

Date: 2006-11-26 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
where can i find this house in tokyo? what station?

Re: Idea for a movie:

Date: 2006-11-26 06:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Okay, after rooting around on Google Earth I've found the exact site of the house -- but it doesn't appear on the picture, which was taken before it was built. It's here (http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=http://imomus.com/moriyamahouse.kmz&ie=UTF8&z=19&t=k&om=1&iwloc=A).

Re: Idea for a movie:

Date: 2007-08-15 05:56 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I'm very happy to have found this house.
Do you know where is the house of Katsujo SEJIMA cold "House in a plum grove"?
It is a small house in Setagaya-ku. But precisely I don't know were.
My mail is marc.belderbos@skynet.be
Thanks a lot for a short answer.

Marc

plans and elevations

Date: 2008-03-06 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
hallo, i'm a student of architecture and i'm going to work on this house for a few weeks; i need the plans (as the house was built in 2005 i can't find the plans in the school library). if anyone can help, pls let me know :) here's my mail: radostinasabeva@abv.bg

Radost

Re: plans and elevations

Date: 2009-10-27 10:53 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
did u find plans because i as well need plans and elevations

(no subject)

Date: 2010-02-14 07:29 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
m an architecture student..we have a project on extension of the house but within the site..Somewhere i read that the residents are not quite happy with the outcome of the whole project.The privacy is the biggest concern..So can i hv any ideas on how can i tackle this problem??..i want to connect spaces which i feel need connection.And also dividing the rented and the owned block in a way that in the future when the owner wants to stay the division shouldn't be a problem...

(no subject)

Date: 2010-02-14 12:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
It might be possible to make the rented and owned parts of the house accessible on different levels, and erect an elevated walkway around the structures which the renters would have to climb.

That said, I think the openness and vulnerability of the buildings is their greatest design asset. It's very sad if that is now considered a defect.

Didn't Moriyama say he was renting only temporarily, while he paid off construction costs? I understand he intends to occupy the whole complex eventually.