The man who listened to music
Sep. 20th, 2005 10:27 am
Doctor, I have a problem. The problem is that I listen to music. It's always in the foreground for me. My ears have no retractable flaps to block it, and my brain can't block it either. That may not seem like a problem to you, but it's a subtle and constant torture. In a world in which background music is omnipresent and usually banal, the creature who listens to music, who really lets it seep into his soul, is truly wretched. Let me tell you three things that happened yesterday, that hurt my ears and hurt my soul.1. I went to the post office on the Frankfurter Allee to mail a letter. There was a queue, as there always is at lunchtime. Facing us were three post office clerks behind a monolithic desk and, above and behind them, a curious wall-mounted device, part camera, part speaker. From this device—it seemed all moulded from the same piece of vanilla-coloured plastic—came the muted sound of a maudlin classic 1960s pop song. It may have been "He Ain't Heavy, He's My Brother". As this "evergreen classic" plucked at the heartstrings of the captive audience in the queue, making our day just a little heavier and sadder whether we were aware of the music or just let it seep in subliminally, the surveillance camera filmed us. Just in case the music failed to control us emotionally, and some criminal incident, some spontaneous uprising, should occur. "So this is pop music's fate," I thought gloomily, "to monitor our hearts while a camera monitors our bodies. To control our inside, the part the camera can't see." My conclusion was as maudlin as the song, staggering heavily from verse to chorus, plaint to refrain.

2. I joined Hisae at the Smart Deli, the Japanese cafe where we eat lunch almost daily. The Smart Deli is a wonderful place where you can get delicious salmon teriyaki for 5 euros, watch taped Japanese cooking and comedy shows, and leaf through the latest edition of post-Shibuya fashion magazine Fudge. The one thing that spoils it is the music. Yumi, the Japanese painter who runs the place, is currently going through a Jack Johnson phase. The last five times we've been to the cafe the same Jack Johnson record has been playing. It's surfer-emo, gentle minimalist music that sounds like Ben Harper without the funk, or the Red Hot Chilli Peppers on Mogadon. The phrasing is clipped and minimal, the tone pleasant if ever-so-slightly maudlin, the persona bland and affable. It's fucking torture — it's the perfect background music, yet I sit there like an idiot listening to it as if it were in the foreground. I can't background music, I'm a musician, for fuck's sake! So I listen to every clipped horrible guitar phrase, I listen to the "tasteful" production, I listen to the slightly masochistic lyrics, the similes and metaphors. At the end I ask Yumi who it is, trying to drop subtle hints. "You obviously like this music very much!" "Yes, my friend recommended him to me, and I got all three albums. It's nice music to play at this time of day." "But you have lots of other CDs, I'm sure there's some nice stuff in there!" "Yes, including your album, the one you gave me!" "Oh no, I don't want to hear my own album!" Just anything other than Jack Johnson. Classical music, reggae dub plates, those Japanese TV shows with the sound up, silence, crickets. It's funny, when you've accepted the Cagean proposition that anything, even silence
, can be "music", when you've been trained by all those "listening artists" to pay attention to the rustling of a paper bag as if it were a symphony, it has an unfortunate side-effect. What's popularly thought of as "music"—even something as 'minimal' as Jack Johnson—is suddenly a massively over-egged pudding. It's unbearable.3. We spent the evening with Anne Laplantine and Xavier. They recently got married, and got a chunk of money from their parents which they decided to spend on a video projector. So each night they have these screenings of DVDs, and invite friends around to watch them. Last night it was my turn to supply the DVDs, so I showed them "The Wicker Man" (despite collaborating with me on "Summerisle", Anne had never seen the film that partly inspired the project) and the unscreened BBC Incredible String Band documentary "Be Glad For The Song Has No Ending". In exchange, Anne lent me a DVD of "The Village", the film they'd screened on Saturday night, and which Hisae and I had skipped because I'd heard it was terrible. When I got home I watched it and it was indeed terrible, and the worst thing about it was the stock Hollywood orchestral score sawing and whining away in the background, telling me how the wooden acting and implausible plot was meant to make me feel. Except that it wasn't in the background at all, it was dangling its wretched banality right in my music-loving, music-hating face.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 08:59 am (UTC)yes, there's where it all goes wrong in the first place. people who make happy music are normally not very happy themselves. though the image of a sad clown is an equally unbearable cliche perhaps.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 09:36 am (UTC)I hear you
Date: 2005-09-20 09:42 am (UTC)I felt bad for the people having to work there and spent more time than just the 20 minutes for breakfast like me.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 09:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 09:50 am (UTC)Re: I hear you
Date: 2005-09-20 10:15 am (UTC)The pan flute Bohemian Rhapsody makes me think of the computer era equivalent.. all the great rock anthems that got the MIDI treatment.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 10:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 10:57 am (UTC)Paradox of the paradox
Date: 2005-09-20 11:29 am (UTC)* Silence is music
* Property is theft
do contain the idea that music is music, and the idea that theft is theft. They are "revolutionary" only in the sense that they bring everything 360 degrees, back to where they started, rather than leaving them at 180, the diametric opposite. Clearly the statement that property is theft deconstructs the idea of property but not the idea of theft... and therefore not the idea of property either. And the statement that silence is music deconstructs the idea of of silence, but not the idea of music, and therefore not the idea of silence either. In order to arrive at a new place, we'd have to dismantle both sides of the binary, in other words the whole distinction. Let's call it "the paradox of the paradox", Grasshopper.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 12:10 pm (UTC)(odot)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 12:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 12:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 12:18 pm (UTC)This is what interested me so much about the Shobus tour, whether you were aware of these different zones with their different attitudes to ambient sound? Did you pass from commercial areas to residential areas, and get totally different responses?
Re: Paradox of the paradox
Date: 2005-09-20 12:22 pm (UTC)Silence is music, thought Cage, and demonstrated the theory by presenting music written in the medium of silence.
Music is silence, it seems you want to say. How would you demonstrate that? How would you present silence in the medium of music?
Is Ambient Music perhaps an attempt at this? Going back to your post, I bought Eno's Music For Airports years ago thinking "Great, I can have it on in the background so it won't be noticed!" -- Which is of course, the entire idea. But it doesn't work for me. I have the same problem you seem to have: I can't not notice it. In fact I find it very hard not to give it my undivided attention. The repetitive nature does not help; in fact, it compounds the problem: I find myself listening ever-more intently to discern the introduction of differences. It's like a kind of musical Chinese water torture, where the only relief comes as the music finishes (of course, ambient music is not intended to "finish.")
But perhaps this just demonstrates anal-retentiveness on my part.
So true ambient music, silent music, would by this definition be an attempt to produce something akin to background noise via conventional instrumentation. If the aim is to avoid being listened to, must the music become unlistenable?
I seem to be gabbling like some kind of arts twat. My apologies. I'll stop now.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 12:24 pm (UTC)Re: Paradox of the paradox
Date: 2005-09-20 12:26 pm (UTC)I believe I first heard the "music in everything" after I started working as a boom operator, and thus suddenly found myself listening as the world around me became amplified. I paid close attention to the sound of footsteps on gravel, subway cars departing, a loose wire dangling on a boat's mast. For a while, I became alienated from music ( the man-made kind).
But then, imagine the following: a warm late summer sunday, a city house in a residential area of a European capital. Most windows are open, and through these windows emerge the sounds of a vacuum cleaner, some television program and at least two competing stereos. It was there that I decided that 'music' is basically noise, and if you think that there is no a priori knowledge of music (a prerequisite to Cage's aforementioned proposition), then you cannot deny that the noise made by people playing 'music' can be an aesthetically pleasing experience in exactly the same way as the rustling of a paper bag.
This, of course, isn't the whole story as far as I'm concerned. But I find it amusing to look at the problem from that perspective.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 12:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 12:34 pm (UTC)I like the idea that, to his Indian ears, Stockhausen was just as alien as, say, Johann Strauss. Most of all I just liked being exposed to music that was not being sold to me. Most high street shops, the Gap, Starbucks etc play pre-selected music tied in with promotional campaigns. The dreadful Joss Stone is the new face of Gap, so if you're sad enough to go in there, they'll probably force you to listen to her horrid music.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 12:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 12:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 01:32 pm (UTC)For me, it isn't just limited to music; I have a very strong sense of smell. The smell of wherever I am is in the foreground as well. I don't know how it is in Berlin, but as far as the Midwest goes, everyone has their damn yankee candles or party-lite candles with these artificial smells that take over their surroundings. If I'm in a place, I'll just fixate on the smell, even if it's minimal or lingering traces. I'll be fully distracted, disgusted by it. On occasion, the reverse is true, a good, authentic smell that I love is equally distracting, but at least in a pleasurable way. Actually, it's sublime.
The same with color, design, texure and taste. If you are always looking, listening, tasting and feeling the whole world becomes foreground.
Somebody (I'm sorry I don't remember who or I'd reference you) mentioned this could be related to age. I'm 27, so while not young, still younger-ish. I think it is more related to the aesthetics of life. Creative people tend view everything for its potential beauty, and thus their senses are always on, and the whole world is, in a sense, the foreground. They are taking in far more sensually, which forces the full spectrum upon them. It's almost a perverse form of bi-polar disorder. Does exposure to the really awful allow more enjoyment of the really good? I know this isn't nearly as theoretical or philosophical a statement or idea as you were getting at with the post. But I suspect it is a gift/plague for a lot of people that read Click Opera. We LOVE what we love, but otherwise, we're rather irritable at the constant waves of mediocrity and predictability for the rest of the day. Please excuse the presumption.
As a side note, I want to read the John Cage book as I think it would help me articulate this better.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 01:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 01:53 pm (UTC)It's one of those, "If I had a penny for everytime I was told I'm too sensitive, I'd be quite well-off scenarios". As frustrating as it can be, I wouldn't trade it in though. At the risk of being completely cheesy, there is far too much beautiful stuff already out there and being created as I type. It's good, it keeps a person from getting cynical.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 02:21 pm (UTC)"As a boy I used to weep in butchershops".
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-20 02:34 pm (UTC)http://www.cheapsurrealism.com/sounds/Spoken_Interlude.mov