imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
"I will marry my daughter, for she is the counterpart of my late wife, otherwise I can find no bride who resembles her."

I haven't made much music this year; half the gear in my studio seems to have broken down. But I have made a couple of collaborations here and there, one in Tokyo (demos for a project called Bambie) and one here in Berlin, back in late May and early June, with Japanese visual artist Yukiko Sawabe. Yukiko wanted some music for a piece she's making about the Brothers Grimm fairy tale Allerleirauh.



"Then she ran into her den, washed herself quickly, and took out of the nut the dress which was as silvery as the moon, and put it on. Then she went up and was like a princess, and the King stepped forward to meet her, and rejoiced to see her once more, and as the dance was just beginning they danced it together. But when it was at end, she again disappeared so quickly that the King could not observe where she went. She, however, sprang into her den, and once more made herself a hairy animal, and went into the kitchen to prepare the bread soup."

Yukiko has agreed to let me post two of the songs here today, along with the artwork she's made for the project. The mp3 file below contains "Allerleirauh" (from the Daughter side) and "King Song" (from the King side). Yukiko wrote the words and sang, I made the music.

Allerleirauh + King Song (Yukiko Sawabe and Nick Currie) 2.1 MB, 128 kbps stereo mp3 file, 2.19mins.

"Then he grasped her by the hand, and held her fast, and when she wanted to release herself and run away, her fur-mantle opened a little, and the star-dress shone forth. The King clutched the mantle and tore it off. Then her golden hair shone forth, and she stood there in full splendour, and could not longer hide herself. And when she had washed the soot and ashes from her face, she was more beautiful than any one who had ever been seen on earth. But the King said, "Thou art my dear bride, and we will never more part from each other." Thereupon the marriage was solemnized, and they lived happily until their death."

Yukiko explains: "I'm going to use small space for my exhibition. It was brothel. The exhibition schedule is undicided detail now. Please introduce songs with my art book 'temperature'. These works is based on Grimm's fairy tail, Allerleirauh and Snow White and Seven Dwarfs."

I also want to mention today that Andrew Snyder has set up a new Momus Forum called Sempreverde.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 09:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stanleylieber.livejournal.com
The artwork looks great. Glad to see you've not abandoned music making entirely.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 09:12 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Killer cover art.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 11:18 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
So you make music, too? Is there no end to your talents?

der.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 11:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cutup.livejournal.com
Is the above commentator serious? Do some people only know you as culture critic? (or perhaps I just can't tell a facetious comment when I see it)

Nice piece! I've recently been going through your albums and have to disagree with a comment you once made about not being a great singer - "The Complete History of Sexual Jealousy (Parts 17-24)" and "The Sadness of Things," are good examples that you are. And I find your albums are more "revisitable" than most artists. Looking forward to hearing you sing again (actually, there are still several albums to get to, but you know what I mean). Thanks for being Momus, nick.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 12:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dzima.livejournal.com
I agree with this but I should also say: Momus, stop using MIDI for once! There are whole sound palettes and textures you are abandoning because of this aesthetic decision. You collaborated with Laplantine and Fashion Flesh so you probably learned something new from them.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 12:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Yeah, I have to apologize for the cruddy MIDI nature of this recording, it's because my studio is broken, including my hard disk recorder, and I had to use GarageBand. Not that GarageBand forces you to use MIDI, of course...

I've been thinking about making my new album without MIDI, because I totally share your boredom with it, and with General MIDI instruments.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 12:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I'm sure you're (at least partly) joking, but I have to say that far from abandoing music, I make far too much of it. Record labels don't tend to want you to release more than one album a year, and "Otto Spooky" came out in February. Most music artists let three years pass between releases, yet I'm accused of "abandoning music" if I haven't released anything for six months!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 01:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stanleylieber.livejournal.com
It's meant out of fondness. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 01:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stanleylieber.livejournal.com
Have you considered working with some of your field recordings to create new textures?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 01:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] reflejos.livejournal.com
I loved the songs. Thank you.

Brothers Grimm

Date: 2005-09-13 01:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sweet-thirst.livejournal.com
It would seem that people everywhere are turning back towards the Fairie Tales of their youth.

Not only is the Brothers Grimm film about to be released (although it will take another 2 months before the Uk will have it!!), but among those people I know, there appears to be a desire to recapture what was so beautiful in youth through the medium of Fairie Tales and similar childhood stories.

Perhaps the world has become such a depressive and suffocating place that all anyone wants to do is imagine that those fantasy, beauty and happy-ever-afters (which we grew up longing for) are still somewhat attainable?

Re: Brothers Grimm

Date: 2005-09-13 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Well, you don't have to read far in the Brothers Grimm to come across darkness every bit as profound as the darkness in life. The "happy-ever-after" in Allerleirauh, for instance, is a girl taking her own father's hand in marriage! I mean, that's pretty disturbing on all sorts of levels, isn't it?

Re: Brothers Grimm

Date: 2005-09-13 02:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sweet-thirst.livejournal.com
I could not even attempt to argue that the Grimm tales are not full of darkness – largely because it is for that reason that I love them. However, there is always an over-throwing of the dark state with the implication that such trials, once overcome, will not return and the happy-ever-after state will be maintained eternally.

This is where the two darknesses differ. In life, the darkness that we experience is rarely completely eliminated and, even when it appears to have been, it is not long until such horrors reappear.

While I accept that there are circumstances and consequences tied into the happiness at the end of the Grimm tales, for the most part these are made relatively unimportant by the blissful state achieved. Despite Allerleirauh’s wishes to escape her father and the councillors stating that "God has forbidden a father to marry his daughter, no good can come from such a crime, and the kingdom will be involved in the ruin", ultimately the story ends with: “they lived happily until their death”. Surely their happiness is worth the mental disturbance caused to others? Hence surely it is better for people to strive for some perfect happiness through dark stories if the real world were just as dark but gave no such happy ending?

Re: Brothers Grimm

Date: 2005-09-13 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Is it her own father though? Such an odd, opaque tale I had to read it twice and still couldn't decide. Is she found by "the King, to whom this forest belonged" (ie, her father) or by "the King to whom this forest belonged" (ie, some other king)? If her father, why didn't he recognise her and her dresses? Ah, but that's the mystery of fairy tales I suppose.

Nic B.

Re: Brothers Grimm

Date: 2005-09-13 02:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mongoltrophies.livejournal.com
Wait, isn't the king she marries a second, different king, whose kingdom she enters after running away from her father's? This seems to be implied by the sentence "Then it so happened that the King to whom this forest belonged, was
hunting in it." On me, that registers as a new king, not that it wouldn't be a more interesting story if the whole thing were an elaborate tease on the daughter's part.

I'm curious why you used your own name to release this music. Have you done this before? Is it for legal reasons?

Also, I just saw the Brothers Grimm movie, and except for a few good visuals, it wasn't worthwhile. It relied too much on cheap humor and obvious plot formulae, and was generally way too upbeat for a move about the Grimm fairy tales. It also had nothing to do with the actual Brothers Grimm, although it did allude to Jakob's linguistic accomplishments by mentioning that he was "a scholar".

Re: Brothers Grimm

Date: 2005-09-13 03:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
As discussed here (http://p084.ezboard.com/fsurlalunefairytalesfrm1.showMessageRange?topicID=2580.topic&start=1&stop=20), the Grimms published two versions of this story. The first (http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/type0510b.html#grimm) made it fairly explicit that the second king is her father. The second makes it much more ambiguous (in the English translation everything hinges on a single comma).

Key passages from the first version:

"She walked the entire night until she came to a great forest. She would be safe there. Because she was tired, she sat down in a hollow tree and fell asleep. She was still asleep the next day when the king, her fiancé, came to this forest to hunt. His dogs ran up to the tree and sniffed at it. The king sent his huntsmen to see what kind of animal was in the tree..."

The king is her fiancee, ie her father, not some new king. Later, in the palace, he recognises her:

"The king immediately invited her to dance, and as he danced with her, he thought how closely this unknown princess resembled his own fiancée. The longer he looked at her, the stronger the resemblance. He was almost certain that this was his fiancée, and at the end of the dance, he was going to ask her. However, when they finished dancing, she bowed, and before the king knew what was happening, she disappeared."

Father and daughter then marry and live happily until they die.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 03:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-bee-box.livejournal.com
Beautiful cover work...the colored pencil reminds me of early Kiki Smith "Wolf Girl" a bit. I love how its crudeness is such a contrast to the painting beneath. Still have to listen to the songs.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 03:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spoombung.livejournal.com
I like the way you use MIDI. You arrange your music with a nice sense of economy. I think if you've got a gift for musical arrangement and song structure (as you have) it doesn't really matter if it's synthetic or overly clean sounding, or sequenced. The aesthetic considerations about sound seem less important every year somehow, as new artists appropriate styles considered naff in earlier decades. It's getting harder and more irrelevant to have 'taste' if you know what I mean. Still...if you're bored with MIDI I can see why you want to move on.

Do all your sounds come out of one module - I've often wondered when I listen to the 'Stars Forever' album? What would you do instead of programming, play guitar again?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 04:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Do all your sounds come out of one module

I'd say my most important instrument is my sampler, an Akai S2800. Then the Roland PMA5, which has a bunch of General MIDI-type sounds in it. On "Stars Forever" I used a lot of analog synths too, like the GEM 1000 and the Korg Mono/Poly.

I've been playing guitar a lot recently, since I bought a lovely-toned secondhand acoustic in the local market. But maybe I should teach myself the singing saw, like you, Kev!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 04:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com
Woooo, really cute songs! When will the record come?

Oh, and what is that is broken? The most expensive stuff? The drum Machine?

BTW, sampling is a really fun time waster, recording your own friends and then maybe do a collage just to make fun of them.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 05:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
There's no record of this, just music for an exhibition Yukiko will make "in a brothel" (see the bit I just added at the end of the entry for her website's URL).

Broken is mostly stuff like power adapters, the MIDI connector, the sampler's back-lighting and digital interface...

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spoombung.livejournal.com
"On "Stars Forever" I used a lot of analog synths too, like the GEM 1000 and the Korg Mono/Poly."

Ah, the synths did sound fruity - I thought they might be analog. That PMA thing - is that that ittle thing you play with a metal pencil?
My love affair with the saw is over (I got fed up with it's wail and wobble) and I'm back to an acoustic guitar and a little Reaktoring.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
You've penetrated my dreams, Momus. Funny thing is, I had a dream last night that my father wanted to have sex with me and there was a long, elaborate dream sequence where I got lost in a huge, unfinished love hotel and it culminated as my father was looming above me on the plush bed about to bring forth his penis but the sequence suddenly ended and I found myself dreaming of a drugstore in which I was shopping for baby medicine.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 05:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com
Oh, well, I could always dream, erm. I didn't see much more than that artbook, not many paintings to watch.

Oh, yes, you did write something about your mac's screen broke down. What a pity...

I still need to get back my harddrive...

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 05:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] w-e-quimby.livejournal.com
Momus, this may be off-topic, but it goes back to things you've said previously: Do you believe that truth is relative?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
You show me your truth, Quimby, and I'll show you mine! Whether they're relatives will depend on whether they have relations. I suspect they will, because everything relates to everything else.

Too much music

Date: 2005-09-13 07:16 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I can't understand why people like you and The Fall are called prolific - as if it's a fault - when they do an album a year (or less, as it seems to be these days). And as for working on an album for three years - That's not working, that's jerking off (not that there's anything wrong with that, but give it its correct name). That said, how can you stand not to be writing and recording all the time? Sorry, daft question; but don't you want to do stuff outside what seems to be your normal cycle - you know, that couple of months a year frantically writing and recording? Mind you, that's how Iain Banks works, and he seems to be enjoying it (he seems to fool about in a recording studio for much of the rest of the time). I hope your next album won't be too long, though.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 07:39 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
So you would never argue that any of the things you believe are universally true?

Re: Too much music

Date: 2005-09-13 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
That said, how can you stand not to be writing and recording all the time?

I think you have to get out of music, immerse yourself in other problems, other projects, other thoughts and ways of thinking, and then get re-enchanted with music, come in again from outside it, embrace the things only it can do well.

Plus, my ears get easily battered if I work too intensively on music. It literally makes me physically sick, like Ludovico's Treatment.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 08:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Yes, the PMA is the pencil gadget. Scanner showed me one in New York in 96 and said "You can make albums on planes with these things!", so of course I had to have one. I haven't yet made an album on a plane, in fact all music sounds horrible on planes.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 08:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Only my belief that everything is belief. Then again, some things are beyond belief, or so I believe.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 08:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] w-e-quimby.livejournal.com
So...the universal truth is that there is no universal truth?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 09:16 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
...which is a contradiction in itself.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 09:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Things can be true within systems; it's "true" that you lose the game of Chess if you can't move your king to an unthreatened square, for instance.

Rhetorical questions

Date: 2005-09-13 10:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] w-e-quimby.livejournal.com
The universe contains all systems, but is it a system in itself? Can it be systematically unified? Physically, mathematically, philosophically?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-13 11:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thetemplekeeper.livejournal.com
Well, if you can't move your king or any other pieces and you're not in check (and if it's your turn!), the game is tied in stalemate.

It seems to me, though, that your relativism is checkmated by the contradiction pointed out by Mr Anonymous above. For example, to use your systems analogy, if something can be true within a system, then surely something can also be false within it (eg, if I can't move my chesspieces and I'm not in check, I've won). Perhaps you could say that the contradiction "the universal truth is there is no universal truth" is false only within the system(s) of mathematical logic , which are transcended by relativism; but then you appear to invoke a universalist metaphysics (or maybe just an epistemology) of systems interlain with more systems, with a corresponding hierarchy of truth, not an absence of truth; then the only thing you can say is that we cannot know the "ultimate" truth (if there is one) of what lies beyond all these systems, which statement seems to be true by definition if these systemic layers encapsulate all we could ever know. I cannot see what else you may have in mind, as your analogy seems to envisage a system of belief called "relativism" which is of a higher level than logic (as it includes all mathematical logic in its definition) and contains only the epistemological conviction that "truth is relative"; yet (1) there seems no reason to hold that that level exists and (2) again, it is posited as a universal.

I hope you can catch the gist of the above, even if you believe it is false; I find it hard sometimes to use language as the prime means of argument, as I find it easier to visualise problems than turn them into words - I wish I had time for a scanned diagram, but that would probably be deeply inappropriate on a blog!

Thanks for your time

Simon

Re: Rhetorical questions

Date: 2005-09-13 11:52 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
If it weren't a system, how could all the different sub-systems co-exist?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-14 01:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lovepuppet.livejournal.com
i made this a few years back.


Image
(http://flickr.com/photos/heatherparker)

The Creation of Fat American Man"

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-14 06:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I think that behind my "true in systems" statement was the idea that we designate certain things true. Like computer programmers, we say "Let x = true", and then build a system (chess, the law, religion) around that designated relationship. However, people who believe that these things are objectively true, independent of human agency and independent of designation, have forgotten or repressed this. To my way of thinking it's a very serious mistake. An example would be those who talk about "natural law" (as Tony Blair does from time to time), meaning law which is somehow objective and universal, rather than simply a system of manmade designations which can be re-assigned arbitrarily and still be "true" if so designated.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-14 08:30 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
When will we get a "Sound on Sound" style tour of your studio? Please avoid field recording's as texture. I say more pre sets and smash that guitar. Also what from your recorded output is your favorite album? I'm torn between "Timelord" and "20 VJ" (even if it is guitar heavy). Love to hear a midi only version of " I am a kitten".

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-15 12:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thetemplekeeper.livejournal.com
Hi Nick

Thanks for your reply.

I agree with all of what you've said above; however, if we are right in our beliefs here, then the idea of "natural law" must be a false one, as it cannot be true in certain circumstances - after all, the concept necessarily involves the idea of a law pertaining in all situations. Thus, if you are right about the arbitrary or cultural bases of any conception of law, it appears that the statement "there is no natural law" must be absolutely true. In other words, there are such things as claims to universal validity; and the truth of these claims can only be decided in terms of "is", "isn't" or "undecided". The problem with relativism is that it claims universal validity for the idea that there is no universal validity, so is self-refuting.

Of course, it may be that logic cannot tell us what really pertains independently of the mind. However, I think it would then be better to argue that this is the edge of what we can hope to understand, rather than posit a self-denying universal just beyond comprehensibility. We could be ideosyncratically human in using experimentation, observation, language, imagination, art and reason to describe and explore our world, but these are our only means of understanding, limited as they are. Given that the world is as it appears to us and that, for example, it just follows that, if I have two apples on the table and I eat one, there is one apple left on the table - or, if Kennedy is not a doughnut, then Kennedy is not a doughnut - I think we have to say that, at least within our common modalities of thought and experience, there is the possibility of asystemic truth and falsehood. This qualifies the idea of the universal by making what seems universally true (such as "2 + 3 = 5") only true as far as we can tell, but does not go so far as to deny the possibility of universal truth when such a denial seems neither logically possible nor a statement one can therefore make without claiming to know the unknowable.

Ach, this seems a bit of a rant, I believe... Please bear in mind that my mental state when writing the above was simply one of enthusiastic investigation - I hope you will take this comment as such!

Best wishes

Simon

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags